Talk:BFB 12/@comment-26330618-20180623145539/@comment-35769622-20180623153231

I can see where you're coming from with wanting less developed character to have more chances to shine, but at the same time, I don't think they should be saved only because they are considered "boring". Personally, the mindset of voting out charaters with big edits and keeping the ones with small edits is like a double-edged sword. Sure, it will give them a chance to stand out from a crowd of big personalities, and it really is frustrating too see them sidelined at this current moment. You're right, we still need strong reasons for liking and disliking a character if they have a minimal appearance. But you'd also be risking a shift in the shows interest that's unpredictable. I mean, there's a reason why we haven't had the chance to fully appreciate some of these characters yet, because those who do get great screentime have been keeping the show thus far afloat. Take those characters away, and the writers are put into a situation where they need to make do with these lesser known characters. I'm not saying that's never going to be a good thing, but there's a chance that the whole tone of BFB will change drastically, which can be very erratic.

The solution isn't to vote out popular/bland characters, but to actually give them the chance to do that on their own without having to be forced into that situation. I agree that the fairness in showcasing these characters is unsteady, and we really should see more/less from certain characters. But if fans of the show vote out characters because they seem completely uninterested and apathetic towards them, then I see no problem in that reasoning, since the show is designed to keep us entertained in the first place.